Thursday, January 8, 2009

Module 3: Cybertextspace by Dr Karin Wenz

The more I read the article, the more I understood.

In fact, the content helped me to understand what was written on the Module 3 tutorial notes page - seriously!!!
I was so unimpressed by the text (on the Mod 3 page) that I couldn't concentrate yesterday.
Maybe I was in a flippant mood 24 hours ago.
Unsure.
Anyway, I must've had my thinking cap on today.

Perhaps the best idea from the article (for me personally), is that each person has their own set of beliefs, experiences, and background knowledge - so any information received will ultimately be influenced by these variables, and in turn, will affect what they choose to do with the information.

I think Dr Wenz was trying to describe the internet and the content it holds - however, she kept referring to the game Myst, which I have, but which I played about 10 years ago (and haven't played since).
A check of references showed that the most recent article used dated from 1997 or 1998.

However, despite the age of the article, I don't think the basic way the internet works today is any different to the way it worked back then...except, of course, that it is much vaster and computers are more powerful, making access and ease of access, more immediate and astonishingly quicker.

Another valid point mentioned, was that due to the speed with which information is generated today, the way people experience the world has changed.
It's the internet that has promoted this change.

Hypertext and linking to other sites or explanatory notes (which Wenz used in almost every sentence...and which annoyed me excessively until I realised that each of these 'links' was actually just another point along the linear list on the home/contents page) can also affect what the reader learns or takes away with them.

Wenz's explanation reminded me of the 'Choose Your Own Adventure' books popular with pre-teens in the late '70's-'80's (which allowed children choice in the story).
The hyperlinks in an online text allow the viewer the options to:

1. read in-depth about a particular point

2. skim ahead to the next point

3. jump to another site

4. close the window!

As a result, information gleaned will depend not only on the depth of information read, but also on the paths taken to read that information, as well as the personal background and experiences which the reader brought with them prior to reading.

In all. I found the article 'voiced' many things I already knew, and quite a few which I hadn't previously considered.

Well worth the effort!


3 comments:

  1. My Prospective is that it has changed considerbley ove the last 10 years. The software is considably better of a strat that gives us site such as this one. This has changed the face of the internet and enabled us to do more things with the internet. The other is its content. There is some remarkable people providing content on the internet today compared to a few years ago.


    Do you remember those shoking home pages people had.
    I remember Myst.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've just finished up a unit at Griffith about culture that expounds on what we learned of world views in SSK12 - how we are the sum total of all our experiences to date, and all those experiences influence how we receive the world and interpret it. The internet is no different.

    A great example is the infamous 'heh' in chatting. Some people take 'heh' as a dismissive 'sound'. Others consider it a laugh. You can imagine a conversation between two people from both schools of thinking.. :D It's like cats and dogs wagging tails - they're saying two very different things with the same body language.

    This random comment brought to you by the letters c, o, f, f, and eeeee!

    ReplyDelete
  3. That must have been a great course Amy!

    I'm currently doing a 'Popular Culture' course at Macquarie (SGY120) which is similar but not as heavy on theory - all about observation and questioning *why* we do what we do!

    Yeah, 'heh' sounds more like a laugh to me, but I guess it could also be similar to the other current fad of saying 'whatever' - good points. I like your thinking.
    Thanks for the comments :)

    ReplyDelete